By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.

Understanding the Tax Implications of Personal Injury Settlements With Punitive Damages

A woman taking notes sitting at a desk across from a disabled person wearing a neck brace

The world of personal injury settlements is often a complex and intricate labyrinth. One particular aspect of this domain, frequently misunderstood, revolves around the taxation of settlements that incorporate punitive damages or interest awarded on the settlement amount. As a critical piece of the puzzle, understanding the nuances of these tax implications is paramount. Let's delve into the intricacies of this issue.
Personal injury settlements frequently consist of compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages serve to restore victims to their pre-injury or pre-illness financial state; thus, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) under Section 104(a)(2) allows such damages received due to physical injuries or illness to be exempt from taxation. This provision is designed to offer relief to victims and help them recover without the burden of additional tax liabilities.
Contrarily, punitive damages and interest, the black sheep of the personal injury settlements family, are considered taxable income. Unlike compensatory damages, punitive damages are not awarded to restore the victim to their pre-injury or pre-illness state but to penalize the defendant for their egregious misconduct and to serve as a deterrent against similar future behavior. Consequently, under U.S. tax law, punitive damages fall squarely into the taxable income category.
A pivotal decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in O'Gilvie v. United States reinforced the idea that punitive damages linked to personal injury suits, regardless of their association with physical injury or illness, are taxable. Punitive damage amounts must be included in the recipient's gross income for tax purposes.
Recipients of personal injury settlements that include punitive damages must meticulously report these amounts. Only the punitive and interest components must be listed as "Other Income" on IRS form Form 1040 (2022), Line 8 (See Schedule 1), allowing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to correctly identify the income's nature and apply the appropriate taxation.
Another tax problem arises when punitive damages are awarded and the attorney fees are contingency based.  Commissioner v. Banks, together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was decided before the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that, for federal income tax purposes, the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is taxable income to the taxpayer. The Court ruled that when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. A possible solution to avoid the plaintiff’s taxation of the attorney fees portion of punitive damages is the Plaintiff Recovery Trust.
However, it is essential to remember that legal landscapes can vary, and tax laws and regulations are subject to change. It is, therefore, advisable to consult with a tax professional or a personal injury attorney who can navigate the intricate legal and tax pathways of personal injury settlements.
Negotiating settlements also requires a careful evaluation of the tax implications. Plaintiffs can receive lump sums or periodic payments of their settlements to spread and minimize tax liability. An example of such a tactic would be to accept payment in installments over several years or the Plaintiff Recovery Trust which provides for lump-sum payments.
It is crucial, however, to refrain from attempts to evade taxes by misrepresenting punitive damages as compensatory damages. Such actions can lead to IRS penalties and interest on unpaid taxes.
In conclusion, the path of personal injury settlements and their corresponding tax implications can be challenging. While compensatory damages provide financial restoration to victims, punitive damages act as a deterrent for outrageous behavior. The contrasting tax implications of these damages reflect their differing purposes. It is crucial to seek professional advice to ensure tax compliance.
As the adage goes, only two things are certain in life – death and taxes. It is, therefore, vital to approach taxation with preparedness and diligence.

Disclosure: This content is an overview. It is not a detailed analysis and offers no legal or tax opinion on which you should solely rely. Always seek the advice of competent legal and tax advisors to review your specific facts and circumstances before making any decisions or relying on the content herein.
Any opinions, views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the content contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Eastern Point Trust Company, its Affiliates, or their clients. The mere appearance of content does not constitute an endorsement by Eastern Point Trust Company (“EPTC”) or its Affiliates. The author’s opinions are based upon information they consider reliable, but neither EPTC nor its Affiliates, nor the company with which such author(s) are affiliated, warrant completeness, accuracy or disclosure of opposing interpretations.

EPTC and its Affiliates disclaim all liability to any party for any direct, indirect, implied, special, incidental, or other consequential damages arising directly or indirectly from any use of the content herein, which is expressly provided as is, without warranties.
Article Archive

Get More Information

Your submission has been received.
A member of our team will be in touch with you soon.
Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Please see our Contact Us page for more options to connect with us.