You agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy by your Additional Use of this site.

Qualified Settlement Fund Approval – Listicle of Legal Requirements

May 20, 2025

Discover key legal requirements for Qualified Settlement Fund approval. Learn QSF rules and compliance tips in our listicle!

Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs), also referred to as a §468B Trust or Settlement Fund, are a legal mechanism established under Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code. This mechanism allows for the efficient management and distribution of funds in complex litigation, particularly in cases involving multiple claimants.

The primary benefits of a QSF include deferring taxation for plaintiffs until they receive their settlement funds, providing flexibility in distributing the settlement proceeds, and allowing time to address lien resolution, claims administration, or other post-settlement issues. Additionally, defendants benefit by obtaining an immediate release from liability upon transferring the settlement funds into the QSF.

Approval Process

Navigating the world of QSFs can be complex, but understanding the approval process is crucial. Here, we examine the primary legal requirements and misconceptions surrounding the approval process:

Establishment by Court Order

§ 1.468B-1(c)(1) requires that a QSF obtain the approval of a “Governmental Authority,” which establishes the fund’s legitimacy. There is no requirement that the approval of a Qualified Settlement Fund must come from a court; such suggestions demonstrate a lack of applicable experience and knowledge of IRC § 468B. Without such authorization, the fund is not “qualified” and will not confer the associated tax benefits.

Establishing Before Appeals

It is possible to establish and obtain governmental approval before the appeals process related to the underlying lawsuit is resolved. However, disputes among the claimants may continue after the establishment of the QSF post-settlement.

Extinguishment of Defendant’s Liability

The 468B settlement fund and the associated settlement agreement of judicial order should completely extinguish the defendant’s liability, resulting in no tail liability.

Qualified Settlement Fund Administrator Appointment

A QSF  administrator must be appointed, which is critical in managing the Qualified Settlement Fund administration. Always look for a licensed fiduciary with extensive experience, a proven track record, and avoid escrow-based QSF arrangements, which often lack operational qualifications.

Jurisdiction Retention

The approving 468B Governmental Authority must retain jurisdiction over the fund. This ongoing oversight ensures proper management and distribution. However, when applicable, the court approving the settlement terms or issuing the judicial award retains jurisdiction over the settlement and judicial order terms.

Resolving Claims Against Defendants

§ 1.468B-1(c)(3) requires that the QSF be established “to resolve or satisfy one or more contested or uncontested claims that have resulted or may result from an event (or related series of events) that has occurred, and that has given rise to at least one claim asserting liability.” So-called “Firmwide QSFs,” which comingle unrelated claims, do not meet the requirements of § 1.468B-1(c)(3).

Meeting IRC § 468B Requirements

The fund must meet the requirements of IRC § 468B and the related Treasury Regulations (1.468B-1 et seq.).

Each of the preceding requirements is crucial. Failing to meet even one could jeopardize the entire process and the associated tax treatment. As legal and settlement professionals, we must ensure compliance.

Don’t let the complexities of QSFs intimidate you. With this knowledge, you’re better equipped to navigate the court approval process successfully. Stay informed, stay compliant, and ensure your Qualified Settlement Fund withstands legal scrutiny.

For more details, refer to the comprehensive article on QSF approval requirements.

For a comprehensive overview of tax minimization strategies, see our guide on minimizing tax liability on lawsuit settlements.

Learn how the Plaintiff Recovery Trust addresses the attorney fee double tax created by Commissioner v. Banks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Under IRC § 61, all income from whatever source derived is taxable unless a specific exclusion applies. Lawsuit settlements are included in gross income by default. The key exceptions are physical injury and physical sickness recoveries under IRC § 104(a)(2), which are excluded from gross income when received as compensation for a physical injury or physical sickness claim.

IRC § 104(a)(2) excludes from gross income damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. The exclusion applies to compensatory damages only. The injury or sickness must be physical — emotional distress damages, employment discrimination recoveries, breach of contract proceeds, and punitive damages do not qualify for the exclusion and are taxable.

Yes. Punitive damages are taxable as ordinary income regardless of whether the underlying claim involves a physical injury. IRC § 104(a)(2) does not exclude punitive damages. Even in a physical injury case where compensatory damages are excluded, any punitive damages awarded are included in the plaintiff's gross income and subject to federal income tax.

For most plaintiffs, no. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions under IRC § 67(g) for tax years 2018 through 2025, eliminating the attorney fee deduction for most civil litigation recoveries. IRC § 62(a)(20) provides an above-the-line deduction only for qualifying discrimination and whistleblower cases. Plaintiffs in personal injury, breach of contract, and most tort cases cannot deduct attorney fees under current law.

A Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) under IRC § 468B separates the timing of the defendant's payment from the plaintiff's taxable receipt of funds. The defendant transfers proceeds to the QSF and takes an immediate tax deduction. The plaintiff does not recognize taxable income until distribution from the QSF, preserving a planning window to implement structured settlements, Plaintiff Recovery Trusts, Special Needs Trusts, or other tax-minimization strategies before receiving taxable income.

A Plaintiff Recovery Trust (PRT), administered by Eastern Point Trust Company, addresses the attorney fee double tax created by Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), and worsened by TCJA 2017. The PRT separates the attorney fee portion of the settlement from the plaintiff's taxable recovery, allowing each party to recognize income only on their respective portion. Eastern Point Trust Company has saved plaintiffs $30 million or more through PRT structures. The PRT is implemented during the QSF administration window before taxable distributions occur.

You Have Needs,
We Have Expertise

Discover trust and settlement solutions you won’t find anywhere else – thoughtfully designed to protect assets, simplify processes, and deliver peace of mind.
Expert guidance, every step of the way.

Contact Us
By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by Eastern Point Trust Company, as well as agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.