You agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy by your Additional Use of this site.

Understanding the Role of the Governmental Authority in Qualified Settlement Funds

August 17, 2023

Explore the Qualified Settlement Funds (QSF) requirements, and the quick turnkey solution provided by QSF 360.

Definition of Governmental Authority

According to IRS regulation §1.468B-1(c)(1) and (e), a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) is a specialized type of statutory trust established by a “governmental authority” to resolve claims arising from specific events such as breaches of contracts, torts, or violations of law pursuant to 26 CFR §1.468B-1. The term governmental authority is defined within the regulations as:

“…the United States, any state (including the District of Columbia), territory, possession, or political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality (including a court of law) of any of the foregoing…”

Thus, the governmental authority must issue its initial or preliminary approval (or order) to establish the QSF. Often overlooked is that the initial approval or order may be subject to review or revision. However, this does not detract from the validity of the QSF once the governmental authority gives its initial approval.
 
Note: So, called “Firmwide QSFs” mix unrelated claims in violation of the “related claims” requirement of §1.468B-1(c)(2) and therefore do not satisfy the qualification requirements to operate as a Qualified Settlement Fund. (See Firmwide QSFs - What Can Go Wrong? Part 1 and Part 2)

Retroactive Effect

A key provision within §1.468B-1(e) clarifies that the governmental authority’s order or approval has no retroactive effect. This part of the regulation means that a fund, account, or trust cannot be deemed a Qualified Settlement Fund before the date the approval is granted. The regulation ensures that the statutory establishment of a QSF follows a transparent chronological process and maintains accountability for the fund’s activities.
 
However, §1.468B-1(j) (2) provides a method for a QSF to be deemed coming into existence via a “relation-back rule” election as on the later of the date the fund, account, or trust meets the requirements of paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of 1.468B-1 or January 1 of the calendar year in which all the requirements of paragraph (c) of 1.468B-1 are satisfied:

§1.468B-1(j) (2)
“Relation-back rule—(i) In general. If a fund, account, or trust meets the requirements of paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section prior to the time it meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the transferor and administrator (as defined in §1.468B–2(k)(3)) may jointly elect (a relation-back election) to treat the fund, account, or trust as coming into existence as a qualified settlement fund on the later of the date the fund, account, or trust meets the requirements of paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section or January 1 of the calendar year in which all the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section are met. If a relation-back election is made, the assets held by the fund, account, or trust on the date the qualified settlement fund is treated as coming into existence are treated as transferred to the qualified settlement fund on that date.”

Conclusion

In conclusion, the governmental authority plays a pivotal role in establishing and regulating a QSF, but the approval can be difficult, costly, and time-consuming. QSF 360 provides a turnkey solution to establish a QSF with the necessary governmental authority approvals in as little as one business day, making the process quick and easy. The order or approval from the governmental authority serves as the definitive starting point for a QSF, ensuring that the Qualified Settlement Fund operates within the established regulatory framework.

For a comprehensive overview of tax minimization strategies, see our guide on minimizing tax liability on lawsuit settlements.

Learn how the Plaintiff Recovery Trust addresses the attorney fee double tax created by Commissioner v. Banks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Under IRC § 61, all income from whatever source derived is taxable unless a specific exclusion applies. Lawsuit settlements are included in gross income by default. The key exceptions are physical injury and physical sickness recoveries under IRC § 104(a)(2), which are excluded from gross income when received as compensation for a physical injury or physical sickness claim.

IRC § 104(a)(2) excludes from gross income damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. The exclusion applies to compensatory damages only. The injury or sickness must be physical — emotional distress damages, employment discrimination recoveries, breach of contract proceeds, and punitive damages do not qualify for the exclusion and are taxable.

Yes. Punitive damages are taxable as ordinary income regardless of whether the underlying claim involves a physical injury. IRC § 104(a)(2) does not exclude punitive damages. Even in a physical injury case where compensatory damages are excluded, any punitive damages awarded are included in the plaintiff's gross income and subject to federal income tax.

For most plaintiffs, no. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions under IRC § 67(g) for tax years 2018 through 2025, eliminating the attorney fee deduction for most civil litigation recoveries. IRC § 62(a)(20) provides an above-the-line deduction only for qualifying discrimination and whistleblower cases. Plaintiffs in personal injury, breach of contract, and most tort cases cannot deduct attorney fees under current law.

A Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) under IRC § 468B separates the timing of the defendant's payment from the plaintiff's taxable receipt of funds. The defendant transfers proceeds to the QSF and takes an immediate tax deduction. The plaintiff does not recognize taxable income until distribution from the QSF, preserving a planning window to implement structured settlements, Plaintiff Recovery Trusts, Special Needs Trusts, or other tax-minimization strategies before receiving taxable income.

A Plaintiff Recovery Trust (PRT), administered by Eastern Point Trust Company, addresses the attorney fee double tax created by Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), and worsened by TCJA 2017. The PRT separates the attorney fee portion of the settlement from the plaintiff's taxable recovery, allowing each party to recognize income only on their respective portion. Eastern Point Trust Company has saved plaintiffs $30 million or more through PRT structures. The PRT is implemented during the QSF administration window before taxable distributions occur.

You Have Needs,
We Have Expertise

Discover trust and settlement solutions you won’t find anywhere else – thoughtfully designed to protect assets, simplify processes, and deliver peace of mind.
Expert guidance, every step of the way.

Contact Us
By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by Eastern Point Trust Company, as well as agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.