Never Establish a QSF in Massachusetts – The Unnecessary Taxation of a Qualified Settlement Fund

Under IRC § 61, all income from whatever source derived is taxable unless a specific exclusion applies. Lawsuit settlements are included in gross income by default. The key exceptions are physical injury and physical sickness recoveries under IRC § 104(a)(2), which are excluded from gross income when received as compensation for a physical injury or physical sickness claim.

IRC § 104(a)(2) excludes from gross income damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. The exclusion applies to compensatory damages only. The injury or sickness must be physical — emotional distress damages, employment discrimination recoveries, breach of contract proceeds, and punitive damages do not qualify for the exclusion and are taxable.

Yes. Punitive damages are taxable as ordinary income regardless of whether the underlying claim involves a physical injury. IRC § 104(a)(2) does not exclude punitive damages. Even in a physical injury case where compensatory damages are excluded, any punitive damages awarded are included in the plaintiff's gross income and subject to federal income tax.

For most plaintiffs, no. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions under IRC § 67(g) for tax years 2018 through 2025, eliminating the attorney fee deduction for most civil litigation recoveries. IRC § 62(a)(20) provides an above-the-line deduction only for qualifying discrimination and whistleblower cases. Plaintiffs in personal injury, breach of contract, and most tort cases cannot deduct attorney fees under current law.

A Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) under IRC § 468B separates the timing of the defendant's payment from the plaintiff's taxable receipt of funds. The defendant transfers proceeds to the QSF and takes an immediate tax deduction. The plaintiff does not recognize taxable income until distribution from the QSF, preserving a planning window to implement structured settlements, Plaintiff Recovery Trusts, Special Needs Trusts, or other tax-minimization strategies before receiving taxable income.

A Plaintiff Recovery Trust (PRT), administered by Eastern Point Trust Company, addresses the attorney fee double tax created by Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), and worsened by TCJA 2017. The PRT separates the attorney fee portion of the settlement from the plaintiff's taxable recovery, allowing each party to recognize income only on their respective portion. Eastern Point Trust Company has saved plaintiffs $30 million or more through PRT structures. The PRT is implemented during the QSF administration window before taxable distributions occur.